• Custom Writing Services
  • How to Write a Research Paper
  • Research Paper Topics
  • Research Paper Examples
  • Order

Communication

iResearchNet

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services
Communication » Media » Latitude of Acceptance

Latitude of Acceptance




Social-judgment theorists (Sherif & Hovland 1961) assume that attitudes concerning important topics are bipolar. People have an internal reference scale. The initial attitude on an issue with high ego-involvement influences the reaction to a communication representing a different view. The discrepancy of a communication from one’s own position is decisive for the amount of change achieved by a source because message discrepancy affects the perception of the quality of a message. More discrepant messages are perceived as being more unfair, more illogical, more boring, etc. In order to explain whether a person will change toward or away from a position advocated by a source, Sherif and Hovland (1961) segmented an attitude on a pro and contra issue into three parts (assimilation-contrast theory): latitude of acceptance, latitude of non-commitment (zone of indifference), and latitude of rejection.

Within the latitude of acceptance (on an attitude scale the position most acceptable to a person on a given topic plus other positions which are considered acceptable), a source’s opinion is distorted perceptually as being more similar to one’s own opinion than it really is (“assimilation effect”). Attitude change is unlikely because the source’s point of view is perceived as being similar to one’s own. The reinforcement of one’s already existing attitude will be the most likely effect.




Within the latitude of rejection (the positions one finds objectionable), a source’s opinion is perceived as further removed from one’s own stand than it really is (“contrast effect”). The changing of attitudes in the direction of the source’s position is extremely unlikely because the discrepant communication will be perceived as being more discrepant than it is. One’s opinion is most likely to remain unchanged or even to change in a contrasting way (“boomerang effect”). While accepting and rejecting certain positions concerning an issue, the zone of indifference (latitude of non-commitment) allows an individual to remain neutral (moderate) regarding certain positions. With opinions neither accepted nor rejected, perceptual distortions are least likely to happen. In this zone of indifference, attitudes are most likely to be changed in the direction advocated.

In a series of studies that addressed nontrivial topics (e.g., US presidential elections in 1956 and 1960, labor-management issues, or the Arab Unity issue; see Sherif & Sherif 1969, 357ff.), it was established that the size of the three latitudes varies according to the position an individual upholds. A study by Hovland et al. (1957) tried to answer the question of how a person’s initial position on a certain issue influences reactions to a communication representing different views. The theme addressed was the question of lifting an alcohol ban, which was controversial in Oklahoma (then a “dry” state) at the time of the study. The subjects’ positions ranged from “dry” via “moderate wet” to “wet.” The subjects were confronted with messages that strongly or weakly contradicted their own views. It was found that where discrepancy was great, the credibility of the communicator was doubted. And with increasing distance, the communication was perceived as propagandistic and unfair. Moreover, communications with more deviant opinions were perceived as more distant from one’s own views than they actually were (“contrast effect”). Communications with less deviant opinions were perceived as more similar than they actually were (“assimilation effect”). It was also found that moderate subjects changed more in the direction advocated. If the source’s position is highly discrepant, one is less likely to be influenced and develops doubts about the credibility of a communicator. Bochner and Insko (1966) could demonstrate that greater credibility gives the chance to advocate more discrepant opinions successfully. Opinions of sources with low credibility are more likely to be rejected.

The (relative) size of the latitude of non-commitment is an indicator of the extent of egoinvolvement: the smaller the indifference zone, the greater the ego-involvement. A large latitude of non-commitment is typical of an individual who is not deeply involved. The size of the latitude of non-commitment also proves to be an index of susceptibility to change (Sherif & Sherif 1969, 482, 491). The greater the importance of a topic (involvement), the greater the resistance to attitude change. The width of the latitude of acceptance, according to Hovland et al. (1957), is dependent on the importance of the issue: the more important an issue, the smaller the latitude of acceptance. When compared with a moderate person, an individual with high involvement had a narrower latitude of acceptance and a greater latitude of rejection. The latitude of acceptance of intensively involved persons is significantly smaller than the latitude of rejection and the latitude of non-commitment (Sherif & Sherif 1969, 297). On the other hand, nonpartisan individuals with low involvement have a latitude of acceptance and a latitude of rejection of nearly the same size, and a relatively large latitude of non-commitment.

Concerning the discrepancy between communication content and recipient attitude, linear assumptions (that the greater the distance, the smaller the attitude change) are too simplistic. With unimportant themes and with credible communicators, greater discrepancy can cause more change; greater importance, in other words, implies a greater resistance to change. The following hypotheses can be made:

1 No effect of persuasive communication intended by the communicator is expectable in the rejection zone, but rather a boomerang effect, especially since distorted perception is very likely because of the contrast effect.

2 Attitudes are most likely to be changed in the non-commitment zone.

3 In the acceptance zone, attitude change – even gradual – is unlikely because, within this zone, communications are perceived as similar to one’s own position.

References:

  1. Bochner, S., & Insko, C. A. (1966). Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 614 – 621.
  2. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, vol. 1, pp. 269 –322.
  3. Hovland, C., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(3), 244 –252.
  4. Johnson, B. T., Lin, H.-Y., Symons, C., Campbell, L. A., and Ekstein, G. (1995). Initial beliefs and attitudinal latitudes as factors in persuasion. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 502 –511.
  5. McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, vol. 3, pp. 136 – 314.
  6. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 3rd edn. New York: Random House, vol. 2, pp. 233 –346.
  7. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, vol. 1, pp. 323 –390.
  8. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgement: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  9. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1969). Social psychology. Evanston, IL: Harper and Row.




Communication Research

Communication Research

  • Media
    • Media Economics
    • Media Effects
    • Media History
    • Media Production and Content
    • Media Systems
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Excitation Transfer Theory
    • Effects Of Exemplification And Exemplars
    • Economics of Advertising
    • Antitrust Regulation
    • Audience Commodity
    • Brands
    • Circulation
    • Commercialization of the Media
    • Competition in Media Systems
    • Concentration in Media Systems
    • Consolidation of Media Markets
    • Consumers in Media Markets
    • Cost and Revenue Structures in the Media
    • Cross-Media Marketing
    • Distribution
    • Diversification of Media Markets
    • Economies of Scale in Media Markets
    • Globalization of the Media
    • Labor in the Media
    • Labor Unions in the Media
    • Markets of the Media
    • Media Conglomerates
    • Media Management
    • Media Marketing
    • Mergers
    • Ownership in the Media
    • Piracy
    • Political Economy of the Media
    • Privatization of the Media
    • Forms of Media Corporations
    • Public Goods
    • Agenda-Setting Effects
    • Appraisal Theory
    • Media Effects on Attitudes, Values, and Beliefs
    • Cognitive Availability
    • Albert Bandura
    • Catharsis Theory
    • Steven H. Chaffee
    • Credibility Effects
    • Cumulative Media Effects
    • Desensitization
    • Diffusion of Information and Innovation
    • Emotional Arousal Theory
    • Media Effects on Emotions
    • Effects of Entertainment
    • Fear Induction through Media Content
    • Leon Festinger
    • Framing Effects
    • Frustration Aggression Theory
    • George Gerbner
    • Carl I. Hovland
    • Intercultural Media Effects
    • Elihu Katz
    • Knowledge Gap Effects
    • Latitude of Acceptance
    • Linear and Nonlinear Models of Causal Analysis
    • Mainstreaming
    • Media Effects: Direct and Indirect Effects
    • Media Effects Duration
    • History of Media Effects
    • Media Effects Models: Elaborated Models
    • Strength of Media Effects
    • Media System Dependency Theory
    • Mediating Factors
    • Mediatization of Society
    • Structure of Message Effect
    • Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann
    • Effects of Nonverbal Signals
    • Observational Learning
    • Opinion Leader
    • Order of Presentation
    • Persuasion
    • Physical Effects of Media Content
    • Priming Theory
    • Media Effects on Public Opinion
    • Reciprocal Effects
    • Schemas and Media Effects
    • Effects of Sex and Pornography as Media Content
    • Sleeper Effect
    • Media Effects on Social Behavior
    • Media Effects on Social Capital
    • Social Judgment Theory
    • Trap Effect
    • Two-Step Flow of Communication
    • Secondary Victimization
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • History of Advertising
    • BBC
    • Cable Television
    • History of Censorship
    • History of Cinematography
    • History of Citizen Journalism
    • Civil Rights Movement and the Media
    • Coffee Houses as Public Sphere
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • Collective Memory and the Media
    • History of Digital Media
    • History of Documentary Film
    • History of Elections and Media
    • Electronic Mail
    • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    • Fleet Street
    • Fourth Estate
    • Graffiti
    • Historic Key Events and the Media
    • Illustrated Newspapers
    • Literary Journalism
    • History of Magazine
    • Music Videos
    • Nineteenth-Century New Journalism
    • History of News Agencies
    • History of News Magazine
    • Newscast
    • 24-Hour Newscast
    • Antecedents of Newspaper
    • History of Newspaper
    • Paperback Fiction
    • Penny Press
    • History of Postal Service
    • History of Printing
    • Newsreel
    • Freedom of Communication
    • Propaganda in World War II
    • History of Public Broadcasting
    • Radical Media
    • Radio Networks
    • Radio: Social History
    • Radio Technology
    • Satellite Television
    • History of Sports and the Media
    • History of Telegraph
    • Television Networks
    • Television: Social History
    • Television Technology
    • Underground Press
    • History of Violence and the Media
    • Virtual Reality
    • Watergate Scandal
    • Women’s Movement and the Media
    • Accountability of the Media
    • Accountability of the News
    • Accuracy
    • Balance
    • Bias in the News
    • Commentary
    • Commercialization: Impact on Media Content
    • Conflict as Media Content
    • Consonance of Media Content
    • Construction of Reality through the News
    • Credibility of Content
    • Crime Reporting
    • Editorial
    • Endorsement
    • Ethics of Media Content
    • Fairness Doctrine
    • Fictional Media Content
    • Framing of the News
    • Infotainment
    • Instrumental Actualization
    • Internet
    • Internet News
    • Local News
    • Magazine
    • Media Performance
    • Morality and Taste in Media Content
    • Narrative News Story
    • Negativity
    • Neutrality
    • News
    • News Factors
    • News Production and Technology
    • News Values
    • Newspaper
    • Objectivity in Reporting
    • Plurality
    • Quality of the News
    • Quality Press
    • Radio
    • Radio News
    • Reality and Media Reality
    • Scandalization in the News
    • Sensationalism
    • Separation of News and Comments
    • Soap Operas
    • Soft News
    • Sound Bites
    • Stereotypes
    • Synchronization of the News
    • Tabloid Press
    • Tabloidization
    • Television
    • News
    • Truth and Media Content
    • Violence as Media Content
    • Africa: Media Systems
    • Austria: Media System
    • Balkan States: Media Systems
    • Baltic States: Media Systems
    • Argentina: Media System
    • Bolivia: Media System
    • Brazil: Media System
    • Canada: Media System
    • Caribbean States: Media Systems
    • Central America: Media Systems
    • Chile: Media System
    • China: Media System
    • Colombia: Media System
    • Convergence of Media Systems
    • Cuba: Media System
    • Czech Republic: Media System
    • Egypt: Media System
    • France: Media System
    • Germany: Media System
    • Gulf States: Media Systems
    • India: Media System
    • Iran: Media System
    • Israel: Media System
    • Italy: Media System
    • Japan: Media System
    • Malaysia: Media System
    • Mexico: Media System
    • Netherlands: Media System
    • North Africa: Media Systems
    • Poland: Media System
    • Portugal: Media System
    • Public Broadcasting Systems
    • Russia: Media System
    • Scandinavian States: Media Systems
    • Singapore: Media System
    • South Africa: Media System
    • South Korea: Media System
    • Spain: Media System
    • Switzerland: Media System
    • United Kingdom: Media System
    • United States of America: Media System
    • West Asia: Media Systems
    • Behavioral Norms: Perception through the Media
    • Body Images in the Media
    • Computer Games and Reality Perception
    • Cultivation Effects
    • Disowning Projection
    • Entertainment Content and Reality Perception
    • Extra-Media Data
    • False Consensus
    • False Uniqueness
    • Media Campaigns And Perceptions Of Reality
    • Media Content and Social Networks
    • Media Messages and Family Communication
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Perceived Realism as a Decision Process
    • Perceived Reality as a Communication Process
    • Perceived Reality: Meta-Analyses
    • Perceived Reality as a Social Process
    • Pluralistic Ignorance
    • Pluralistic Ignorance and Ideological Biases
    • Social Perception
    • Social Perception: Impersonal Impact
    • Social Perception: Unrealistic Optimism
    • Socialization by the Media
    • Spiral of Silence
    • Stereotyping and the Media
    • Third-Person Effects
    • Video Malaise

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services