• Custom Writing Services
  • How to Write a Research Paper
  • Research Paper Topics
  • Research Paper Examples
  • Order

Communication

iResearchNet

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services
Communication » Media » Social Perception: Impersonal Impact

Social Perception: Impersonal Impact




According to the impersonal impact hypothesis, the mass media influence individuals’ perceptions of risk to others (societal-level risk), but not perceptions of risk to themselves (personal risk). Implicit in this hypothesis is the notion that individuals can compartmentalize various perceptions of risk, differentiating between societal-level judgments, or beliefs about the larger community with respect to a given risk, and personal-level judgments, or estimations of their own vulnerability to that risk (Tyler & Cook 1984).

Although the disjuncture between first and third persons in impersonal impact also is seen in the third-person effect, two key points are noteworthy. Not only is the perceived risk in the third-person effect the media message itself, but also, unlike the impersonal impact hypothesis, the third-person effect does not require consumption of the media message. Indeed, the third-person effect posits that people believe media to have greater effects on others than on themselves (Davison 1983). Impersonal impact also is conceptually distinct from impersonal influence, a term Mutz (1998) used to describe how anonymous others and individuals outside one’s immediate life-space can influence one’s attitudes, cognitions, and behaviors. Within this domain of research, the media’s role is as a conduit of information regarding others’ attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions.




Studies of impersonal impact are quite robust, illustrating that exposure to media messages shapes individuals’ perceptions that a problem will occur in general; however, these same individuals will not perceive themselves to be afflicted by this problem. This trend has emerged across numerous contexts including social risks such as crime, drunk driving, firearms; environmental risks including fires, tornadoes, floods, and radioactive waste; and health risks such as AIDS and skin cancer. Methodologically, survey research and experimental design are the two most common tools used to test this hypothesis.

Some scholars believe that media messages may not have any “personal” impact because individuals tend to see themselves as less susceptible to risk than others. This unrealistic optimism exists regardless of exposure to media coverage of risk: individuals think negative events are much less likely to happen to them, and positive events much more likely to occur. Also, individuals are unwilling to acknowledge the risk unless they are aware of behaviors that might reduce the risk at hand, and media coverage of risk tends to provide different types of information. Given journalistic practices, news stories are more likely to report on events rather than the likelihood of those events occurring. Reporters also appeal to human interest by including exemplars (e.g., interviews with individuals, anecdotes) that may or may not accurately represent reality or base-rate information (Fiegenson & Bailis 2001). Even if the story reports risks, individuals tend to process messages consistent with existing cognitions and attitudes.

In contrast to media messages, interpersonal communication concerning a particular risk can influence personal-level judgments. After all, interpersonal communication often is with like-minded others who have similar life experiences and can be more persuasive than the media in getting one to take action. This similarity between the individual and a like-minded source of communication may enhance the processing of messages. Also, because certain information, such as that derived from personal experience with a given risk, is deemed more relevant than media reports of that risk, it is processed and assimilated into one’s schema more easily. Not surprisingly then, assessments of personal risk would be based on the calling forth of direct experience (Shrum & Bischak 2001).

Despite the prevalence of support for the impersonal impact hypothesis, more recent research has generated evidence of media impact on personal-level judgments. Collectively, these studies support the differential impact hypothesis, which posits that under some conditions, the media will influence perceptions of risk to oneself. For instance, in line with media system dependency theory, media effects are stronger when other information sources (e.g., interpersonal communication) are insufficient. Consistent with previous findings, one study showed that exposure to newspaper stories about skin cancer increased estimates of societal risk, and that interpersonal talk about skin cancer increased perceptions of risk to oneself. However, newspaper exposure increased perceptions of personal risk of skin cancer only among those who depended heavily on newspapers for health information (Morton & Duck 2001).

Another factor that might facilitate the personal impact of media messages involves the vividness of the message. Vivid information is emotionally interesting and dramatic, and typically includes numerous images. The nature of vivid information therefore makes the story (and the risk) more likely to be recalled when individuals are asked for estimates of risk. Also, the dramatic fashion in which this type of information is conveyed may encourage the media consumer to identify with the portrayed victim, and perceived similarity tends to reduce the gap between perceptions of societal- and personal-level risk. In support of this theorizing is evidence that exposure to entertainment media and communication with peers, professionals, and parents – not exposure to news media – influenced undergraduates’ perceptions of personal risk of AIDS (Snyder & Rouse 1995).

Findings that support the impersonal impact hypothesis and the differential impact hypothesis have great theoretical and practical implications. On the theoretical front, this body of research suggests that the mass media/interpersonal communication divide can indeed be bridged, and the two can and do work in tandem to influence perceptions. Moreover, individual-level characteristics need to be factored into the study of effects.

Although media impact on risk perceptions provides scholars with a theoretically interesting area of research, the more significant question revolves around how media and perceptions of risk influence risk-related behaviors. Research on the impersonal impact hypothesis has profound implications for the construction of health campaign messages. Campaign planners will need to decide how to format their messages – for example, determine whether to use dramatically presented information, and whether a particular celebrity sponsor will be effective. These considerations, among others, will go into crafting specific messages for specific audiences the campaign is trying to target. Planners also will need to ascertain which media messages will generate interpersonal discussion, and which will likely lead to perceptions of personal risk and, ultimately, to behaviors that will reduce the risk at hand.

References:

  1. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15.
  2. Fiegenson, N. R., & Bailis, D. S. (2001). Air bag safety: Media coverage, popular conceptions, and public policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 7, 444–481.
  3. Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28, 602–626.
  4. Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Shrum, L. J., & Bischak, V. D. (2001). Mainstreaming, resonance, and impersonal impact: Testing moderators of the cultivation effect for estimates of crime risk. Human Communication Research, 27, 187–215.
  6. Snyder, L. B., & Rouse, R. A. (1995). The media can have more than an impersonal impact: The case of AIDS risk perceptions and behavior. Health Communication, 7, 125–145.
  7. Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693–708.




Communication Research

Communication Research

  • Media
    • Media Economics
    • Media Effects
    • Media History
    • Media Production and Content
    • Media Systems
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Excitation Transfer Theory
    • Effects Of Exemplification And Exemplars
    • Economics of Advertising
    • Antitrust Regulation
    • Audience Commodity
    • Brands
    • Circulation
    • Commercialization of the Media
    • Competition in Media Systems
    • Concentration in Media Systems
    • Consolidation of Media Markets
    • Consumers in Media Markets
    • Cost and Revenue Structures in the Media
    • Cross-Media Marketing
    • Distribution
    • Diversification of Media Markets
    • Economies of Scale in Media Markets
    • Globalization of the Media
    • Labor in the Media
    • Labor Unions in the Media
    • Markets of the Media
    • Media Conglomerates
    • Media Management
    • Media Marketing
    • Mergers
    • Ownership in the Media
    • Piracy
    • Political Economy of the Media
    • Privatization of the Media
    • Forms of Media Corporations
    • Public Goods
    • Agenda-Setting Effects
    • Appraisal Theory
    • Media Effects on Attitudes, Values, and Beliefs
    • Cognitive Availability
    • Albert Bandura
    • Catharsis Theory
    • Steven H. Chaffee
    • Credibility Effects
    • Cumulative Media Effects
    • Desensitization
    • Diffusion of Information and Innovation
    • Emotional Arousal Theory
    • Media Effects on Emotions
    • Effects of Entertainment
    • Fear Induction through Media Content
    • Leon Festinger
    • Framing Effects
    • Frustration Aggression Theory
    • George Gerbner
    • Carl I. Hovland
    • Intercultural Media Effects
    • Elihu Katz
    • Knowledge Gap Effects
    • Latitude of Acceptance
    • Linear and Nonlinear Models of Causal Analysis
    • Mainstreaming
    • Media Effects: Direct and Indirect Effects
    • Media Effects Duration
    • History of Media Effects
    • Media Effects Models: Elaborated Models
    • Strength of Media Effects
    • Media System Dependency Theory
    • Mediating Factors
    • Mediatization of Society
    • Structure of Message Effect
    • Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann
    • Effects of Nonverbal Signals
    • Observational Learning
    • Opinion Leader
    • Order of Presentation
    • Persuasion
    • Physical Effects of Media Content
    • Priming Theory
    • Media Effects on Public Opinion
    • Reciprocal Effects
    • Schemas and Media Effects
    • Effects of Sex and Pornography as Media Content
    • Sleeper Effect
    • Media Effects on Social Behavior
    • Media Effects on Social Capital
    • Social Judgment Theory
    • Trap Effect
    • Two-Step Flow of Communication
    • Secondary Victimization
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • History of Advertising
    • BBC
    • Cable Television
    • History of Censorship
    • History of Cinematography
    • History of Citizen Journalism
    • Civil Rights Movement and the Media
    • Coffee Houses as Public Sphere
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • Collective Memory and the Media
    • History of Digital Media
    • History of Documentary Film
    • History of Elections and Media
    • Electronic Mail
    • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    • Fleet Street
    • Fourth Estate
    • Graffiti
    • Historic Key Events and the Media
    • Illustrated Newspapers
    • Literary Journalism
    • History of Magazine
    • Music Videos
    • Nineteenth-Century New Journalism
    • History of News Agencies
    • History of News Magazine
    • Newscast
    • 24-Hour Newscast
    • Antecedents of Newspaper
    • History of Newspaper
    • Paperback Fiction
    • Penny Press
    • History of Postal Service
    • History of Printing
    • Newsreel
    • Freedom of Communication
    • Propaganda in World War II
    • History of Public Broadcasting
    • Radical Media
    • Radio Networks
    • Radio: Social History
    • Radio Technology
    • Satellite Television
    • History of Sports and the Media
    • History of Telegraph
    • Television Networks
    • Television: Social History
    • Television Technology
    • Underground Press
    • History of Violence and the Media
    • Virtual Reality
    • Watergate Scandal
    • Women’s Movement and the Media
    • Accountability of the Media
    • Accountability of the News
    • Accuracy
    • Balance
    • Bias in the News
    • Commentary
    • Commercialization: Impact on Media Content
    • Conflict as Media Content
    • Consonance of Media Content
    • Construction of Reality through the News
    • Credibility of Content
    • Crime Reporting
    • Editorial
    • Endorsement
    • Ethics of Media Content
    • Fairness Doctrine
    • Fictional Media Content
    • Framing of the News
    • Infotainment
    • Instrumental Actualization
    • Internet
    • Internet News
    • Local News
    • Magazine
    • Media Performance
    • Morality and Taste in Media Content
    • Narrative News Story
    • Negativity
    • Neutrality
    • News
    • News Factors
    • News Production and Technology
    • News Values
    • Newspaper
    • Objectivity in Reporting
    • Plurality
    • Quality of the News
    • Quality Press
    • Radio
    • Radio News
    • Reality and Media Reality
    • Scandalization in the News
    • Sensationalism
    • Separation of News and Comments
    • Soap Operas
    • Soft News
    • Sound Bites
    • Stereotypes
    • Synchronization of the News
    • Tabloid Press
    • Tabloidization
    • Television
    • News
    • Truth and Media Content
    • Violence as Media Content
    • Africa: Media Systems
    • Austria: Media System
    • Balkan States: Media Systems
    • Baltic States: Media Systems
    • Argentina: Media System
    • Bolivia: Media System
    • Brazil: Media System
    • Canada: Media System
    • Caribbean States: Media Systems
    • Central America: Media Systems
    • Chile: Media System
    • China: Media System
    • Colombia: Media System
    • Convergence of Media Systems
    • Cuba: Media System
    • Czech Republic: Media System
    • Egypt: Media System
    • France: Media System
    • Germany: Media System
    • Gulf States: Media Systems
    • India: Media System
    • Iran: Media System
    • Israel: Media System
    • Italy: Media System
    • Japan: Media System
    • Malaysia: Media System
    • Mexico: Media System
    • Netherlands: Media System
    • North Africa: Media Systems
    • Poland: Media System
    • Portugal: Media System
    • Public Broadcasting Systems
    • Russia: Media System
    • Scandinavian States: Media Systems
    • Singapore: Media System
    • South Africa: Media System
    • South Korea: Media System
    • Spain: Media System
    • Switzerland: Media System
    • United Kingdom: Media System
    • United States of America: Media System
    • West Asia: Media Systems
    • Behavioral Norms: Perception through the Media
    • Body Images in the Media
    • Computer Games and Reality Perception
    • Cultivation Effects
    • Disowning Projection
    • Entertainment Content and Reality Perception
    • Extra-Media Data
    • False Consensus
    • False Uniqueness
    • Media Campaigns And Perceptions Of Reality
    • Media Content and Social Networks
    • Media Messages and Family Communication
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Perceived Realism as a Decision Process
    • Perceived Reality as a Communication Process
    • Perceived Reality: Meta-Analyses
    • Perceived Reality as a Social Process
    • Pluralistic Ignorance
    • Pluralistic Ignorance and Ideological Biases
    • Social Perception
    • Social Perception: Impersonal Impact
    • Social Perception: Unrealistic Optimism
    • Socialization by the Media
    • Spiral of Silence
    • Stereotyping and the Media
    • Third-Person Effects
    • Video Malaise

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services