• Custom Writing Services
  • How to Write a Research Paper
  • Research Paper Topics
  • Research Paper Examples
  • Order

Communication

iResearchNet

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services
Communication » Media » Fairness Doctrine

Fairness Doctrine




The Fairness Doctrine, from its inception in the 1940s to its demise in the 1980s, epitomizes American broadcast law in flux. In adopting the broadcast policy, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of the United States intended broadcast licensees to make reasonable effort to discuss controversial issues and to do it fairly by affording equal treatment to conflicting viewpoints. But the doctrine was abolished in 1987 by the Reagan administration, which thought it had outlived its usefulness.

Nearly every democratic media system considers impartiality and balancing the sine qua non of its broadcasting law and regulation. Yet few countries impose impartial and balanced programming upon their broadcasters the way the United States did with the Fairness Doctrine. Perhaps Israel is the only nation that has directly borrowed from the US broadcasting rule, but the Israeli Fairness Doctrine is not identical to its American model, and should be instructive to those interested in the international and comparative approaches to the Fairness Doctrine.




The US Fairness Doctrine has evolved through the policy statements and rules of the FCC. In 1949, the FCC officially announced the doctrine:

Broadcast licensees have an affirmative duty generally to encourage and implement the broadcast of all sides of controversial public issues over their facilities, over and beyond their obligation to make available on demand opportunities for the expression of opposing views. It is clear that any approximation of fairness in the presentation of any controversy will be difficult if not impossible of achievement unless the licensee plays a conscious and positive role in bringing about balanced presentation of the opposing viewpoints (Report on Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees, 13 F.C.C. 1246, 1251 [1949]).

When revising the Communications Act’s Equal Time Rule for political candidates in 1959, Congress noted the obligation of a broadcaster “to operate in the public interest and to afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance” (47 U.S.C. § 315(a) [1981]). Courts and the FCC read into this statutory language the Fairness Doctrine as a legal obligation for broadcasters.

When challenged in the late 1960s, the Fairness Doctrine was upheld by the US Supreme Court, along with its corollary rules on personal attacks and political editorials. When the public interest requires, the Court held, the FCC may direct the licensees to “present those views and voices which are representative of the community, and which would otherwise be barred from the airwaves” (Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389 [1969]). The Court noted spectrum scarcity and the broadcast licensees’ fiduciary duty to the public.

In the 1980s, however, the FCC started questioning the Fairness Doctrine. Given cable and other new electronic technologies, the FCC wondered about the doctrine’s scarcity rationale. A federal appeals court in 1986 declared that the doctrine was not a statutory requirement but an administrative policy, and one year later the FCC repealed the doctrine. It argued that broadcasters suffered from the doctrine’s “chilling effect” and that the scarcity issue was no longer valid. In 2000, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the FCC to abolish the Fairness Doctrine’s component rules on personal attacks and political editorials. The Court found no justification for retention of the doctrine’s corollary rules, for it had already repealed the doctrine.

Congress has tried unsuccessfully to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine since its abolition in 1987. President Ronald Reagan and his successor, George H. W. Bush, vetoed legislation that would codify the doctrine. Most recently, in 2005, two bills – the Fairness and Accountability in Broadcasting Act and the Media Ownership Reform Act – were introduced to Congress. Neither bill has made progress.

The theoretical and conceptual foundation of the US Fairness Doctrine is recognized in broadcasting law and regulation internationally. This is no surprise. Whether or not free speech jurisprudence is libertarian, the broadcasting media are more tightly regulated than the print media. Fairness in broadcast programming is mandated or recommended by way of right of reply or impartiality/balance requirement. A case in point is the European Union Directive, which provides for the right of reply for any natural or legal person when television broadcasting damages the person’s reputation. The right of reply under the EU Directive parallels the personal attack rule of the US Fairness Doctrine.

Broadcasters in Europe have a general duty to present news and issues in an impartial, objective, and neutral way. The impartiality requirement especially is accepted in most western European countries. The UK Broadcasting Act, for example, states: “(b) that any news given (in whatever form) in its programmes is presented with due accuracy and impartiality; (c) that due impartiality is preserved on the part of persons providing the programmes as respects matters of political or industrial controversy or relating to current public policy”.

In a number of European nations, the right of reply is also accepted to insure balance and impartiality in broadcasting. If a program questions the reputation of an individual or institution, the BBC Producers’ Guidelines stipulates, it is presumed that those criticized have a fair opportunity to respond. On the other hand, the impartiality doctrine in European countries does not allow broadcasters to editorialize public issues. This stands in sharp contrast with the US Fairness Doctrine. American broadcasters could express their views on public controversies if they provided others with the opportunity to counter their opinions.

The Israeli Fairness Doctrine traces its origin to the US Fairness Doctrine. Nonetheless, its underlying principles relate more to the European concept of impartiality than to the American notion of fairness. The Broadcasting Law and the Second Authority for Radio and Television Law mandate a fair representation of ideas, but proscribe editorializing. Nor do they provide for discussion of controversial issues as part of programming requirements. Rather, broadcasters should present different views that are “prevalent” in Israeli society.

The right of reply is recognized statutorily (i.e., Second Authority for Radio and Television Law) and administratively (i.e., Telecommunications Regulations). It is also included in an internal broadcasting guideline (i.e., Broadcasting Authority Regulations). Besides, Israeli courts accept it in incorporating the personal attack rule of the US Fairness Doctrine into Israeli law. Most significantly, the Israeli Fairness Doctrine is thriving while its US progenitor has died. In tweaking the American doctrine to their legal system, Israelis have turned to the European principle of impartiality and pluralism.

References:

  1. Carmi, G. (2005). Comparative notions of fairness: Comparative perspectives on the fairness doctrine with special emphasis on Israel and the United States. Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, 4, 275 –308.
  2. Geller, H. (1973). The fairness doctrine in broadcasting: Problems and suggested courses of action. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
  4. Robertson, G., & Nicol, A. (2002). Media law, 4th edn. London: Penguin.
  5. Schejter, A. (1999). The fairness doctrine is dead and living in Israel. Federal Communications Law Journal, 51, 281–300.
  6. Simmons, S. (1998). The fairness doctrine and the media. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  7. Ugland, E. (2005). Recent developments: The fairness doctrine redux: Media bias and the rights of broadcasters. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 7, 301–313.




Communication Research

Communication Research

  • Media
    • Media Economics
    • Media Effects
    • Media History
    • Media Production and Content
    • Media Systems
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Excitation Transfer Theory
    • Effects Of Exemplification And Exemplars
    • Economics of Advertising
    • Antitrust Regulation
    • Audience Commodity
    • Brands
    • Circulation
    • Commercialization of the Media
    • Competition in Media Systems
    • Concentration in Media Systems
    • Consolidation of Media Markets
    • Consumers in Media Markets
    • Cost and Revenue Structures in the Media
    • Cross-Media Marketing
    • Distribution
    • Diversification of Media Markets
    • Economies of Scale in Media Markets
    • Globalization of the Media
    • Labor in the Media
    • Labor Unions in the Media
    • Markets of the Media
    • Media Conglomerates
    • Media Management
    • Media Marketing
    • Mergers
    • Ownership in the Media
    • Piracy
    • Political Economy of the Media
    • Privatization of the Media
    • Forms of Media Corporations
    • Public Goods
    • Agenda-Setting Effects
    • Appraisal Theory
    • Media Effects on Attitudes, Values, and Beliefs
    • Cognitive Availability
    • Albert Bandura
    • Catharsis Theory
    • Steven H. Chaffee
    • Credibility Effects
    • Cumulative Media Effects
    • Desensitization
    • Diffusion of Information and Innovation
    • Emotional Arousal Theory
    • Media Effects on Emotions
    • Effects of Entertainment
    • Fear Induction through Media Content
    • Leon Festinger
    • Framing Effects
    • Frustration Aggression Theory
    • George Gerbner
    • Carl I. Hovland
    • Intercultural Media Effects
    • Elihu Katz
    • Knowledge Gap Effects
    • Latitude of Acceptance
    • Linear and Nonlinear Models of Causal Analysis
    • Mainstreaming
    • Media Effects: Direct and Indirect Effects
    • Media Effects Duration
    • History of Media Effects
    • Media Effects Models: Elaborated Models
    • Strength of Media Effects
    • Media System Dependency Theory
    • Mediating Factors
    • Mediatization of Society
    • Structure of Message Effect
    • Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann
    • Effects of Nonverbal Signals
    • Observational Learning
    • Opinion Leader
    • Order of Presentation
    • Persuasion
    • Physical Effects of Media Content
    • Priming Theory
    • Media Effects on Public Opinion
    • Reciprocal Effects
    • Schemas and Media Effects
    • Effects of Sex and Pornography as Media Content
    • Sleeper Effect
    • Media Effects on Social Behavior
    • Media Effects on Social Capital
    • Social Judgment Theory
    • Trap Effect
    • Two-Step Flow of Communication
    • Secondary Victimization
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • History of Advertising
    • BBC
    • Cable Television
    • History of Censorship
    • History of Cinematography
    • History of Citizen Journalism
    • Civil Rights Movement and the Media
    • Coffee Houses as Public Sphere
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • Collective Memory and the Media
    • History of Digital Media
    • History of Documentary Film
    • History of Elections and Media
    • Electronic Mail
    • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    • Fleet Street
    • Fourth Estate
    • Graffiti
    • Historic Key Events and the Media
    • Illustrated Newspapers
    • Literary Journalism
    • History of Magazine
    • Music Videos
    • Nineteenth-Century New Journalism
    • History of News Agencies
    • History of News Magazine
    • Newscast
    • 24-Hour Newscast
    • Antecedents of Newspaper
    • History of Newspaper
    • Paperback Fiction
    • Penny Press
    • History of Postal Service
    • History of Printing
    • Newsreel
    • Freedom of Communication
    • Propaganda in World War II
    • History of Public Broadcasting
    • Radical Media
    • Radio Networks
    • Radio: Social History
    • Radio Technology
    • Satellite Television
    • History of Sports and the Media
    • History of Telegraph
    • Television Networks
    • Television: Social History
    • Television Technology
    • Underground Press
    • History of Violence and the Media
    • Virtual Reality
    • Watergate Scandal
    • Women’s Movement and the Media
    • Accountability of the Media
    • Accountability of the News
    • Accuracy
    • Balance
    • Bias in the News
    • Commentary
    • Commercialization: Impact on Media Content
    • Conflict as Media Content
    • Consonance of Media Content
    • Construction of Reality through the News
    • Credibility of Content
    • Crime Reporting
    • Editorial
    • Endorsement
    • Ethics of Media Content
    • Fairness Doctrine
    • Fictional Media Content
    • Framing of the News
    • Infotainment
    • Instrumental Actualization
    • Internet
    • Internet News
    • Local News
    • Magazine
    • Media Performance
    • Morality and Taste in Media Content
    • Narrative News Story
    • Negativity
    • Neutrality
    • News
    • News Factors
    • News Production and Technology
    • News Values
    • Newspaper
    • Objectivity in Reporting
    • Plurality
    • Quality of the News
    • Quality Press
    • Radio
    • Radio News
    • Reality and Media Reality
    • Scandalization in the News
    • Sensationalism
    • Separation of News and Comments
    • Soap Operas
    • Soft News
    • Sound Bites
    • Stereotypes
    • Synchronization of the News
    • Tabloid Press
    • Tabloidization
    • Television
    • News
    • Truth and Media Content
    • Violence as Media Content
    • Africa: Media Systems
    • Austria: Media System
    • Balkan States: Media Systems
    • Baltic States: Media Systems
    • Argentina: Media System
    • Bolivia: Media System
    • Brazil: Media System
    • Canada: Media System
    • Caribbean States: Media Systems
    • Central America: Media Systems
    • Chile: Media System
    • China: Media System
    • Colombia: Media System
    • Convergence of Media Systems
    • Cuba: Media System
    • Czech Republic: Media System
    • Egypt: Media System
    • France: Media System
    • Germany: Media System
    • Gulf States: Media Systems
    • India: Media System
    • Iran: Media System
    • Israel: Media System
    • Italy: Media System
    • Japan: Media System
    • Malaysia: Media System
    • Mexico: Media System
    • Netherlands: Media System
    • North Africa: Media Systems
    • Poland: Media System
    • Portugal: Media System
    • Public Broadcasting Systems
    • Russia: Media System
    • Scandinavian States: Media Systems
    • Singapore: Media System
    • South Africa: Media System
    • South Korea: Media System
    • Spain: Media System
    • Switzerland: Media System
    • United Kingdom: Media System
    • United States of America: Media System
    • West Asia: Media Systems
    • Behavioral Norms: Perception through the Media
    • Body Images in the Media
    • Computer Games and Reality Perception
    • Cultivation Effects
    • Disowning Projection
    • Entertainment Content and Reality Perception
    • Extra-Media Data
    • False Consensus
    • False Uniqueness
    • Media Campaigns And Perceptions Of Reality
    • Media Content and Social Networks
    • Media Messages and Family Communication
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Perceived Realism as a Decision Process
    • Perceived Reality as a Communication Process
    • Perceived Reality: Meta-Analyses
    • Perceived Reality as a Social Process
    • Pluralistic Ignorance
    • Pluralistic Ignorance and Ideological Biases
    • Social Perception
    • Social Perception: Impersonal Impact
    • Social Perception: Unrealistic Optimism
    • Socialization by the Media
    • Spiral of Silence
    • Stereotyping and the Media
    • Third-Person Effects
    • Video Malaise

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services