• Custom Writing Services
  • How to Write a Research Paper
  • Research Paper Topics
  • Research Paper Examples
  • Order

Communication

iResearchNet

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services
Communication » Media » Antitrust Regulation

Antitrust Regulation




As a neo-liberal approach to media policymaking has spread, many nations have relied more heavily on competition and the marketplace to shape the structure and output of their electronic media industries. The result has been a greater reliance on antitrust laws designed to maintain a competitive marketplace rather than industry-specific regulations. Indeed, this faith in the marketplace to produce optimal outcomes has been so great that it has often led to a view that promoting competition is virtually the only concern policymakers should have. But there has also been a countervailing force at work. In an era of growing media globalization and regionalization, many governments have seen the need to allow media corporations to grow in order to compete in this new global media economy. The result has often been a reluctance to apply antitrust laws as rigorously as in the past.

Origins Of Antitrust Regulation

In the United States, antitrust laws developed in the late nineteenth century as a reaction to the growth of big business. These laws were designed to limit the economic and political power of these firms and their ability to collude in the creation of cartels to dominate an industry by destroying potential competitors and setting prices at levels that harmed consumers.




Wells (2002) has observed that this reaction against cartels was a particularly American phenomenon. Their existence in other countries was often tolerated and sometimes even supported by governments as a way of stabilizing markets. However, following World War II, the United States began to actively export its ideas about the role of antitrust laws. Wells notes that these efforts were successful in Europe but failed elsewhere, for example in postwar Japan.

Antitrust And The Electronic Media

The application of antitrust law in the case of a specific industry requires both the definition of the relevant market and an assessment of the level of competition within that market. But defining the boundaries of the relevant market in the case of electronic media industries can be especially difficult. For example, if there are two competing providers of satellite radio to a nation, how should that market be defined if they wish to merge? Is it just the existing satellite radio market that should be considered? Or should terrestrial radio broadcasters be seen as participants in the market? Perhaps even providers of online services allowing consumers to download music should also be included.

Napoli (2001, 153 –176) has noted the difficulty in defining the geographic market for media products before making an assessment of the level of competition, since, while satellite services are aimed primarily at a national market, competition between broadcast radio or television stations often takes place in a more localized market. In addition, Napoli also distinguishes between various content markets and audience markets. Here the concept of substitutability is important in the assessment of the level of competition in a media market. For example, in an audience market, two competing broadcast radio stations may be attracting audiences with little or no overlap. To a potential advertiser the members of one audience are not substitutable for those of the other. However, as Napoli points out, even if the relevant market can be defined, the issue of how to assess the level of competition in that market is not without its problems.

Various competition-concentration indices have been used, including, in the United States perhaps most frequently, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which is calculated by summing the squares of the revenue shares of all participants in a market. This works well if the measure chosen for the analysis is the share of the total advertising revenue attracted by all participants in a market. The problem with this type of assessment of the level of market concentration in media industries is that while this kind of measure may produce an index that is too low to allow companies to use their market power to fix prices, the level of market concentration may still be seen as harmful to the democratic conversation. An inability to control advertising rates may not correlate with a desire for a diversity of voices to be heard in a community.

Antitrust And The Marketplace Of Ideas

In the approach promoted by the Chicago School of economics, the central issue in antitrust law is whether a company can use its market power to fix prices. This view came to dominate antitrust enforcement in the United States during the 1980s. From this viewpoint, antitrust law is solely concerned with levels of competition and market efficiency. It does not address the role communications media play in a democratic society by providing access to a wide range of diverse voices; that is, the creation and maintenance of a “marketplace of ideas.” While the application of antitrust laws in a way that is solely designed to promote economic efficiency will probably also promote some of the democratic ideals embodied in the concept of the marketplace of ideas, the question is what it will miss. For example, a market may be found to be entirely unconcentrated provided it does not give any of those operating in that market the power to raise prices, even if a particular category of media content is entirely absent. This could include the complete absence of media products reflecting the lived experiences of specific cultural or ethnic groups. In the case of a geographically defined local media market, there could also be no local content, with all media outlets in that market being programmed from remote locations.

As a result of this narrow definition of antitrust as a purely economic issue, there has been a reluctance in the United States to stop media mergers. Vertical integration leading to the creation of media conglomerates has rarely been challenged. Whether or not these mergers might harm citizens, rather than consumers, has been ignored in favor of the argument that such mergers create market efficiencies. Some have argued that this is a major flaw in the Chicago perspective and particularly troublesome in the way the antitrust laws have been used to assess large media mergers in the United States (Conrad 1996 –1997). They also conclude that case law and legislative history do not support this narrow interpretation of the role of antitrust laws to the exclusion of concerns about the marketplace of ideas (Stucke & Grunes 2001, 273 –275).

Antitrust And The Concentration Of Media Ownership

As the number of sector-specific rules limiting media mergers has decreased, some have expressed a concern that the application of antitrust law has proved an ineffective substitute for those rules in halting what they perceive to be the growing concentration of media ownership. Their concern is related to the concept of the marketplace of ideas discussed above, and they fear that the growing concentration of ownership is creating a situation where the leaders of a few large media conglomerates have the power to control the content of that marketplace of ideas (Baker 2002; McChesney 2004, 235 – 240). They call for antitrust laws to be applied with a focus not only on the benefits of allowing increasingly large media conglomerates to achieve market efficiencies, but also on the harm this may do to maintaining a vigorous democratic debate.

Critics of this line of thinking have responded by arguing that the media industries are not highly concentrated if one considers all media. They point to the proliferation of new media technologies in recent years, especially the Internet, and suggest that this is actually increasing diversity of control. They also argue that ownership does not necessarily confer control, since the day-to-day decisions made in the many divisions of a media conglomerate must be left to managers and cannot be overseen by the individual leaders. This argument is, however, countered by noting that while operational control over the day-to-day operations of media conglomerates may have passed to managers, the owners still have allocative control (Williams 2003, 73 – 95). For example, setting the expected profit margin for a particular division within a media corporation can have profound impacts on its day-to-day operations without any direct intervention. The need to make greater profits can result in decreased numbers of reporters in a newsroom or a reduction in the number of pages in a newspaper and the elimination of some types of news.

In conclusion, a reliance on antitrust law to regulate media industries, especially when those laws are interpreted solely in terms of whether companies can use their market power to set prices, may be inadequate to protect some of the democratic ideals raised by the special role media industries play in the democratic process.

References:

  1. Baker, C. E. (2002). Media concentration: Giving up on democracy. Florida Law Review, 54, 839 – 919.
  2. Conant, M. (1960). Antitrust in the motion picture industry: Economic and legal analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  3. Conrad, K. (1996 –1997). Media mergers: First step in a new shift of antitrust analysis? Federal Communications Law Journal, 49, 675 –700.
  4. McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the twenty-first century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  5. Napoli, P. M. (2001). Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  6. Shelanski, H. A. (2006). Antitrust law as mass media regulation: Can merger standards protect the public interest? California Law Review, 94, 371– 421.
  7. Stucke, M. E., & Grunes, A. P. (2001). Antitrust and the marketplace of ideas. Antitrust Law Journal, 69, 249 –302.
  8. Wells, W. (2002). Antitrust and the formation of the postwar world. New York: Columbia University Press.
  9. Williams, K. (2003). Understanding media theory. London: Arnold.




Communication Research

Communication Research

  • Media
    • Media Economics
    • Media Effects
    • Media History
    • Media Production and Content
    • Media Systems
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Excitation Transfer Theory
    • Effects Of Exemplification And Exemplars
    • Economics of Advertising
    • Antitrust Regulation
    • Audience Commodity
    • Brands
    • Circulation
    • Commercialization of the Media
    • Competition in Media Systems
    • Concentration in Media Systems
    • Consolidation of Media Markets
    • Consumers in Media Markets
    • Cost and Revenue Structures in the Media
    • Cross-Media Marketing
    • Distribution
    • Diversification of Media Markets
    • Economies of Scale in Media Markets
    • Globalization of the Media
    • Labor in the Media
    • Labor Unions in the Media
    • Markets of the Media
    • Media Conglomerates
    • Media Management
    • Media Marketing
    • Mergers
    • Ownership in the Media
    • Piracy
    • Political Economy of the Media
    • Privatization of the Media
    • Forms of Media Corporations
    • Public Goods
    • Agenda-Setting Effects
    • Appraisal Theory
    • Media Effects on Attitudes, Values, and Beliefs
    • Cognitive Availability
    • Albert Bandura
    • Catharsis Theory
    • Steven H. Chaffee
    • Credibility Effects
    • Cumulative Media Effects
    • Desensitization
    • Diffusion of Information and Innovation
    • Emotional Arousal Theory
    • Media Effects on Emotions
    • Effects of Entertainment
    • Fear Induction through Media Content
    • Leon Festinger
    • Framing Effects
    • Frustration Aggression Theory
    • George Gerbner
    • Carl I. Hovland
    • Intercultural Media Effects
    • Elihu Katz
    • Knowledge Gap Effects
    • Latitude of Acceptance
    • Linear and Nonlinear Models of Causal Analysis
    • Mainstreaming
    • Media Effects: Direct and Indirect Effects
    • Media Effects Duration
    • History of Media Effects
    • Media Effects Models: Elaborated Models
    • Strength of Media Effects
    • Media System Dependency Theory
    • Mediating Factors
    • Mediatization of Society
    • Structure of Message Effect
    • Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann
    • Effects of Nonverbal Signals
    • Observational Learning
    • Opinion Leader
    • Order of Presentation
    • Persuasion
    • Physical Effects of Media Content
    • Priming Theory
    • Media Effects on Public Opinion
    • Reciprocal Effects
    • Schemas and Media Effects
    • Effects of Sex and Pornography as Media Content
    • Sleeper Effect
    • Media Effects on Social Behavior
    • Media Effects on Social Capital
    • Social Judgment Theory
    • Trap Effect
    • Two-Step Flow of Communication
    • Secondary Victimization
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • History of Advertising
    • BBC
    • Cable Television
    • History of Censorship
    • History of Cinematography
    • History of Citizen Journalism
    • Civil Rights Movement and the Media
    • Coffee Houses as Public Sphere
    • Effects of Violence as Media Content
    • Academy Awards
    • Collective Memory and the Media
    • History of Digital Media
    • History of Documentary Film
    • History of Elections and Media
    • Electronic Mail
    • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    • Fleet Street
    • Fourth Estate
    • Graffiti
    • Historic Key Events and the Media
    • Illustrated Newspapers
    • Literary Journalism
    • History of Magazine
    • Music Videos
    • Nineteenth-Century New Journalism
    • History of News Agencies
    • History of News Magazine
    • Newscast
    • 24-Hour Newscast
    • Antecedents of Newspaper
    • History of Newspaper
    • Paperback Fiction
    • Penny Press
    • History of Postal Service
    • History of Printing
    • Newsreel
    • Freedom of Communication
    • Propaganda in World War II
    • History of Public Broadcasting
    • Radical Media
    • Radio Networks
    • Radio: Social History
    • Radio Technology
    • Satellite Television
    • History of Sports and the Media
    • History of Telegraph
    • Television Networks
    • Television: Social History
    • Television Technology
    • Underground Press
    • History of Violence and the Media
    • Virtual Reality
    • Watergate Scandal
    • Women’s Movement and the Media
    • Accountability of the Media
    • Accountability of the News
    • Accuracy
    • Balance
    • Bias in the News
    • Commentary
    • Commercialization: Impact on Media Content
    • Conflict as Media Content
    • Consonance of Media Content
    • Construction of Reality through the News
    • Credibility of Content
    • Crime Reporting
    • Editorial
    • Endorsement
    • Ethics of Media Content
    • Fairness Doctrine
    • Fictional Media Content
    • Framing of the News
    • Infotainment
    • Instrumental Actualization
    • Internet
    • Internet News
    • Local News
    • Magazine
    • Media Performance
    • Morality and Taste in Media Content
    • Narrative News Story
    • Negativity
    • Neutrality
    • News
    • News Factors
    • News Production and Technology
    • News Values
    • Newspaper
    • Objectivity in Reporting
    • Plurality
    • Quality of the News
    • Quality Press
    • Radio
    • Radio News
    • Reality and Media Reality
    • Scandalization in the News
    • Sensationalism
    • Separation of News and Comments
    • Soap Operas
    • Soft News
    • Sound Bites
    • Stereotypes
    • Synchronization of the News
    • Tabloid Press
    • Tabloidization
    • Television
    • News
    • Truth and Media Content
    • Violence as Media Content
    • Africa: Media Systems
    • Austria: Media System
    • Balkan States: Media Systems
    • Baltic States: Media Systems
    • Argentina: Media System
    • Bolivia: Media System
    • Brazil: Media System
    • Canada: Media System
    • Caribbean States: Media Systems
    • Central America: Media Systems
    • Chile: Media System
    • China: Media System
    • Colombia: Media System
    • Convergence of Media Systems
    • Cuba: Media System
    • Czech Republic: Media System
    • Egypt: Media System
    • France: Media System
    • Germany: Media System
    • Gulf States: Media Systems
    • India: Media System
    • Iran: Media System
    • Israel: Media System
    • Italy: Media System
    • Japan: Media System
    • Malaysia: Media System
    • Mexico: Media System
    • Netherlands: Media System
    • North Africa: Media Systems
    • Poland: Media System
    • Portugal: Media System
    • Public Broadcasting Systems
    • Russia: Media System
    • Scandinavian States: Media Systems
    • Singapore: Media System
    • South Africa: Media System
    • South Korea: Media System
    • Spain: Media System
    • Switzerland: Media System
    • United Kingdom: Media System
    • United States of America: Media System
    • West Asia: Media Systems
    • Behavioral Norms: Perception through the Media
    • Body Images in the Media
    • Computer Games and Reality Perception
    • Cultivation Effects
    • Disowning Projection
    • Entertainment Content and Reality Perception
    • Extra-Media Data
    • False Consensus
    • False Uniqueness
    • Media Campaigns And Perceptions Of Reality
    • Media Content and Social Networks
    • Media Messages and Family Communication
    • Media and Perceptions of Reality
    • Perceived Realism as a Decision Process
    • Perceived Reality as a Communication Process
    • Perceived Reality: Meta-Analyses
    • Perceived Reality as a Social Process
    • Pluralistic Ignorance
    • Pluralistic Ignorance and Ideological Biases
    • Social Perception
    • Social Perception: Impersonal Impact
    • Social Perception: Unrealistic Optimism
    • Socialization by the Media
    • Spiral of Silence
    • Stereotyping and the Media
    • Third-Person Effects
    • Video Malaise

Custom Writing Services

Custom Writing Services